Monthly Archives: January 2016

Dogs and Dentists

No cavities. The perennial teacher’s pet in me was cockahoop after my dentist appointment today which was a roaring success compared to previous encounters…

…like the time he pulled out my wisdom tooth. Or that time when he diagnosed my sore jaw as an episode of Victorian-style hysteria which is specific to women around 30 years old. (apparently, this is a thing, ladies).

But the thing that made me laugh out loud today was this Very British (true?) story about a man and his dog trying to help someone trapped in a car boot. These are the things that make Twitter worth it.

 

Advertisements
Tagged , , , ,

Things that Make no sense

I feel like this could be a theme for 2016: #thingsthatmakenosense .

Early contenders from this week so far, which could also be filed under “Wow, that escalated quickly”:

  • B.O.B. really seems to believe that the earth is flat. Like, for reals, you guys. Twitter told him. B.O.B repelled all takers. Even renowned scientist Neil deGrasse Tyson told him. Then B.O.B released a diss track about him and Tyson’s eponymous nephew issued a reply. I actually like B.O.B. but I’m going to have to file his music under “guilty pleasures” along with Blurred Lines on the grounds of sheer ignorance. Whisky. Tango. Foxtrot.
  • How Google paid the UK approx £130 million in back taxes and is going to pay Italy roughly the same amount even though the Italian operation is less than a tenth of the size of the UK one. Part of me is quite pleased that Osborne’s attempt to gain political capital by touting this “deal” has rebounded spectacularly
Tagged , , , ,

Agenda Setting and Mondays

I’m still a social sciences nerd so I was intrigued to read a short post on Conservative Home about how the Prime Minister is dominating the news cycle.

If there is one thing this government likes to do it’s make policy announcements. Set speeches. Signal this or point towards that.

The year started with a blaze of such announcements, from immigration to economics (pro tip: we are totally heading for some sort of second crash and Osborne is putting clear water between him and any falling masonry) and social affairs. The latter has mostly been the PM looking prime ministerial, usually framing these issues through the lens of security. Most recently, saving his fire for Muslim women who can’t speak English.

The tactics are interesting. He takes something that’s not necessarily unreasonable and puts crazy rocket boosters on it. Case in point, the English issue.

Should everyone speak English? Yes. Because it matters in terms of access to opportunities and playing a full part in society, being part of the community around you. There was an opportunity to talk invite people who can’t speak English being part of “us”; or, rather, to be even more a part of us. They already are, of course.

Instead, while having cynically cut funding English language services that were designed to help people in this exact situation, Cameron singles out Muslim women, frames the whole issue in terms of radicalisation as if they are the reason some young people are joining Daesh when countless mother’s hearts have been broken by this, and then throws some (but nowhere near enough to replace what he cut) money at it.

Cue discussion and think pieces for days.

He gets to look tough to the ring wing and leaves the rest of us wading through the nonsense, fighting to tease out the nuances with a deliberately naive right wing press insisting, “Is it unreasonable to want everyone to speak English?” No, but…

Turns out this is a well-deployed media agenda-setting tactic:

“These Monday initiatives have three main purposes.  First, to get the media to report and comment on Government plans that are not about the EU referendum, thereby reminding voters that it has other reasons to be here.  Second, to show people that the Prime Minister is still in office and still in charge.  And, third, to tackle issues that are important to him.” – Paul Goodman

And for those nerds interested in process:

Sunday provides an opportunity to brief bits of the speech or article or initiative to the Sunday papers.  Monday brings the address or piece itself, together with a photo-opportunity for the cameras.  By the afternoon, the blogs and oped-pages are filling up, and the mix of outraged commentary, analysis and counter-intuitive support can be guaranteed to drag on into Tuesday.  Tiger mothers – back in the jungle?  Strengthening cohesion or stigmatising Muslims – what do you think?  That’s three days worth of coverage.  Voters won’t remember much of the detail, if any, but the thrust of Cameron’s case might just linger a bit in their minds for a while.  And as long as it’s one that’s not offensive to them then it’s mission accomplished for Downing Street. – Paul Goodman

Oh, and that fight we’re all having? Well, that’s part of it too. Unfortunately, these games have real-world consequences. Muslim women are statistically most likely to suffer from Islamophobic attacks. Being singled out negatively on the biggest political stage, linked with people’s fears of Daesh and radicalisation, only serves to further alienate them.

But,  it depends whether you’re really trying to help or just cynically posture, using Muslim women as a foil:

Number Ten itself admits that it’s hard to make an impact if you don’t provoke a row: “there has to be some grit in the oyster,” as one Downing Street source put it to me. – Paul Goodman

 

 

Tagged , ,

So 2016 started like this

…But I’m back now. hokw4mhwgapmu